Quote:
Originally Posted by cormick  Jurys still out on that one...with Port losing Symes, i bet you wouldve been happy to pick him up...
and...whats with "a bottom 8 side, near the bottom of the ladder, is very bad"
of course a bottom 8 side will be near the bottom of the ladder...
and why is it bad to get two quality players and still have good draft picks...it would be the same as if we had finished second last and there was no priorities- pick 2, then 15 clubs later, its up to pick 18...so we havent done too bad... |
Hell no, I wouldn't go near McMahon. Port have a million running players like him(Pettigrew, P.Burgoyne) who can play in defence and we have more than enough speedy midfielders. McMahon is soft, gets pushed off the ball too easily and makes poor desicions. Surely the grand final showed that this is NOT what Port need to pick up.
The whole reason why this draft is weak is because it has no depth. Richmond have given one of their two picks where some good players would have been left for what will become two fringe players. This now means that the Richmond have a very small chance of getting a KPP player in the top 20, which is what they need. Good job Terry.
Quote:
| we have plenty of inside midfielders, (Foley, Tuck, Jackson, Coughlan, Polo etc), |
So you have no
good inside midfielders. Yes, Foley is good but he is the type of player that will struggle when tagged.