View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 02:47 AM
Tippaz
Chief Sports Writer
Tippaz's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,335
vCash: 500
Tippaz is on a distinguished road
Default

as a Cox/Simmonds/Hampson/Meesen owner myself, i can understand where you're coming from.

i've been pondering the Meesen -> Kreuzer move too, but here's my reasoning against it.....
- everyone owns Cox/Simmonds
- everyone owns Kreuzer + West/Meesen
- if 1 of Cox/Simmonds were to miss, everyone would want to play Kreuzer
- however, you may only name 3 emergencies
- the smartest thing to do (usually) is to have 1 back, 1 mid, 1 forward
- therefore, no one really covers the rucks (secret alliance for elite DTers), so they'll just end up with 0 anyway
- as long as Cox/Simmonds are named in their lineups you'll have nothing to worry about

why trade when do don't HAVE to ???
__________________

-- JULY 2007--
Tippaz is offline
Reply With Quote