Dreamteam Question - Wrong to have money on the bench?

[DonzFC]

hey guys, i remember earlier in the piece people having players of value sitting on the pine and some guys saying its not good to have too high value players sitting on the bench, but is it actually wrong?


Once you are happy with your starting team Isnt it better off to have a few players at 140 000 (kozi,rodan ect)on the bench that you expect to rise/or get points ... rather than have rookie bench and cash in the bank...and not have these players at all?

Atleast if you have them, you can sell them off after they rise or sub them onto your starting line up.........sounds better than buying them after they have already risen in price

[rOdGe]

Yeah im against people saying its a waste. The younger/cheaper players will play and make you money but wont play as long and be as significant. But if you get players like Hudson/Kosi/Darcy/Lappin etc it will be very handy if u get an injury and can slot in them $140,000 players. Becasue they will be a good chance of scoring well. Better than a rookie and for not much more money. Go for it if you think your starting lineup is good, because you can save trades doing that.