Shaw and Didak

[Don]

Bloody hell just when things were bad enough...it gets worse.......

Obviously a lesson has to be learned here, both should be banned from Anzac day games for 3 years.

Poor Mick has so much on his plate at the moment, maybe a team leaders meating can sort these two meat heads, get together chew the fat, but dont mince words.

Talk of a top 4 spot now seems pie in the sky, unless they snag at least 3 more wins.

Rustle up a few new players

[tkv]

First the Eagles full of 'bad boys', now Collingwood. Maybe it's Micky?

[Perry]

Maybe it is Micky. Time for a change I think. He has had the resources, everything anyone could have had. Think he lost control 3 years ago & never got it back.

[Tippaz]

i reckon Didak has played his last game for Collingwood.

and, not so confident in Ben Cousins becoming a Magpie anymore.

[PeterTexas]

Sadly these two have really let their club, their teamates and their supporters down big time.

[Mabo]

Originally Posted by Tippaz

i reckon Didak has played his last game for Collingwood.

and, not so confident in Ben Cousins becoming a Magpie anymore.

Not that I overly care, but do you really think Collingwood will cut off their noses to spite their faces? Getting rid of Didak cheap would be a massive mistake. There is no doubt over the last few days he has somewhat reduced in value.

[rooboy_Tim]

It's a big call isn't it. But I think they would be wise in keeping Didak.

It's a slightly different kettle of fish to Big bad Barry Hall. But both players continue to let their team down, yet the club believes they are too much of an influence towards the club to get rid of them.

I agree with what Peter Daicos said about Didak. He is too much of a valuable player to be traded. But I thought Cousins was too valuable to the eagles to be traded. Yet the unthinkable actually happened.

If Didak is traded what do you think is a fair trade in return to the pies for him?

[MIGHTY MAGPIES 01]

Originally Posted by rooboy_Tim

It's a big call isn't it. But I think they would be wise in keeping Didak.

It's a slightly different kettle of fish to Big bad Barry Hall. But both players continue to let their team down, yet the club believes they are too much of an influence towards the club to get rid of them.

I agree with what Peter Daicos said about Didak. He is too much of a valuable player to be traded. But I thought Cousins was too valuable to the eagles to be traded. Yet the unthinkable actually happened.

If Didak is traded what do you think is a fair trade in return to the pies for him?

If Didak is traded, i think a fair trade would be a Top-20 Draft Pick, otherwise we might as well keep him.

[tkv]

The AFL forced the Eagles to sack Cousins (with big smirks from vindictive police and loser media types). They got ZERO in trade terms for all their pain.
The Eagles have been more hammered than any club EVER, yet these concepts of 'bringing the game into disrepute' and bad 'club culture' are surely in evidence elsewhere??!

[vasco]

didak is a fool who should've learnt from his mistakes the first time. i can't see collingwood keeping him on despite all his talent. i don't think this stunt has cheapened his value though, he is still a quality player and collingwood deserves something substantial in return. i don't think it's fair that they have to give him up but i can't see them acting any differently really. he's made a mockery of the club.