What should Judd get

[smileatme]

Don't like eye gougers and Judd can't say he was going for the ball, I think 2 weeks minimum.

[Brades]

Well if they want to be consistent it should be a reprimand. I mean there was clearer footage of Holland and Johnson and Holland got a reprimand.

Funny how everyone is suggesting that, yet Farmer gets 6. Shows you how much Freo are hated by the MRP at the moment.

[PAFC]

The Farmer incident was totally different to the Holland one, don't be a douche Brades

[Borak]

oh yeh, poor Fremantle... not

Farmer is a dirty ******* and he got what he deserved

I'de say 2 weeks for the Judd incident

[Brades]

HOw was it different? You could see the eye gouging clearer in the Holland one

I'm not saying Farmer didn't deserve what he got, I'm saying Holldan deserved it and now that the AFL has set a precedent, Judd will get off.

[Judd3]

I couldn't believe what I saw. How dare the umpires report Judd. That was not an eye gauge.




























I'll start again I can't believe what I saw. Judd, that's dirty son. You should get at least 2. Disappointing.

[ALI-G]

Going on the Holland incident he will get cleared. Don't think there was any intention there and he didn't appear to poke or prode more an accidental strike than a gouge.

[PieMan73]

Holland and Judd were wrestling with their opponents and eye contact was coincidental from that (actually I couldn't tell for sure if Judd even made contact with his eyes), whilst Farmer was blatantly and purposely going for the dude's eyes. Judd should get off going on the Holland precedent.

[sceadugenga]

Full points to Campbell Brown who denied Judd gouged his eye today. Says he thought he may have been scratched. Fair play to young Brown.
Brown says Judd did not eye gouge - realfooty.com.au

[Eagle Eye]

Sanity prevails