![]() | ![]() | ![]() | | ||||
![]() | | | | | | ||
| | | ||||||
| | |||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Cadet Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Norwood S.A.
Posts: 47
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I've reviewed lots of SC teams and no one seems to be is picking Mumford. He isn't on Sydney's injury list and if last year is anything to go by he looks like having a great year. Okay he had an injury late last year and doesn't seem to have played any practice matches this year. Does anyone have an update of Mumford? Is he worth picking for round 1?
Cox seems to be preferred Ryder. Cox's form in the NAB certainly was impressive. However Ryder is younger and could potentially improve his average score by more than Cox this year. Any thoughts about picking Ryder over Cox? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Guru Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Geelong , Victoria, Australia
Posts: 710
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Have the three in a short list of 90 players. Mumford & Cox have a bye on same weekend there take Ryder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 226
Thanks: 24
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 2 ![]() |
Most people including myself this year are going for premiums rucks. Sandilands and Cox seems to be the most common combination. Cox in my eyes is great value and should score around the 100 mark.
__________________
SAINTS 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Grand Master Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,258
Thanks: 12
Thanked 88 Times in 75 Posts
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Quote:
The question is can he back it up. Also not sure what the new sub rule means to Mummy or the return of Seaby. Quote:
I have a funny feeling Ryder will be used to plug gaps
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bobby Dazzler For This Useful Post: | tryhardbiker (03-20-2011) |
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Grand Master Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia.
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 1
Thanked 78 Times in 73 Posts
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Mumford's knees have to hold up before I even consider him. He had a breakout season last year and looks set for more of the workload this year but he tends to be too much of a 'bash and crash' player which could hurt your team if he goes down.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: frankston
Posts: 344
Thanks: 31
Thanked 32 Times in 31 Posts
Rep Power: 2 ![]() |
anyone considered Jamar?
Ive got him due to Melbourne's bye situation and prefer him over mummy
__________________
![]() Team Ramrod |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 2011, cox, mumford, rucks, ryder, supercoach |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Disclaimer |
| The information and subject matter on this page may not be reproduced, republished or mirrored on another web page or website. Authority to use any material from our site must be sought prior to publishing. We highly recommend for gambling or betting purposes any scores, results, news, free tips and data quoted should only be used as a guide. Web pages on our network may provide links to other sporting or general internet sites for the convenience of users. Advertising or links to external sites is not permitted without the prior permission of Talking Football management. Talking Football is not responsible for the availability or content of these external sites, nor do we endorse or guarantee the products, apparel, services or information described by these sites unless specified by us. **Talking Football is the moderator of this segment - forum - chat room and as such will make all reasonable efforts to exclude material that is clearly libellous or inflammatory. We cannot however accept responsibility for the accuracy of all rumours, hearsay comments, idle gossip or claims made by contributors and remind contributors that Australia has laws prohibiting defamation and vilification. Our forums and chat rooms are for all to enjoy. |